互联网时代，农村协同治理存在“公开—监督”、“互动—协商”与“开放—共治”三种模式。“公开—监督”模式多以门户网站为依托，注重信息公开与公共监督，规范基层权力，化解社会矛盾；“互动—协商”模式以“微政务”平台为依托，注重对话与协商，化解社会分歧，提供个性服务；“开放—共治”模式以各类移动终端为依托，注重数据资源共享与开放式治理，推动多元主体协同共治。三种协同治理模式是信息技术发展、社会实际需求与国家推动力度共同作用的结果。其中，信息技术发展是必要条件，社会实际需求与国家推动力度是充分条件。在农村治理现实中，要充分考虑上述三种条件合理选择相应的协同治理模式，促进乡村治理有效实现。

In the Internet era exist three modes of rural cooperative governance; namely, publicity of social affairs & supervision, interaction & negotiation, and openness & co-governance. The model of publicity of social affairs is mainly based on portal websites, focusing on information disclosure and public supervision, regulating grassroots power, and resolving social contradictions while the interaction and negotiation model relies on the "micro-government affiliated" platforms, highlighting dialogues and negotiations, resolving social differences and offering personalized services. The openness and co-governance model falls back on various mobile terminals, stressing data resource sharing and open governance, and promoting co-governance of multiple subjects. The three collaborative governance models are the result of the combined effects of information technology development, social needs, and the State's promotion. Among them, information technology development is a necessary condition whereas social needs and the State's promotion are sufficient conditions. Hence, it is indispensable to fully consider the above three conditions and select a corresponding collaborative governance model to promote rural governance more effectively.

C912.82