信息网络犯罪案件的管辖权冲突已经成为我国当前互联网刑事司法治理中的一大难题。我国刑事管辖权的现有规则形式复杂、体系严密，仍无法妥当厘定信息网络犯罪管辖权的最后归属，反而在司法实践中形成了各种管辖权冲突。究其原因，主要是管辖权规则内部之间的冲突丛生，表现为犯罪地的过度扩张解释、指定管辖的二次冲突、并案处理的内在龃龉以及上提管辖的消极后果等。囿于信息网络犯罪的特质性，管辖权的冲突无法完全消除，妥当的应对之策应当是针对具体的规则冲突进行协调处理，主要包括以紧密关联为原则简化犯罪地的认定类型、完善指定管辖适用的规范化标准、建立强制并案规则与分案处理标准以及试点互联网法院专门管辖部分信息网络犯罪案件。

The conflict of jurisdiction in information and cyber crime cases has become a big problem in the current internet criminal justice governance in China. The existing rules of criminal jurisdiction in China are complex in form and strict in system, which are still unable to properly determine the final attribution of the jurisdiction in information and cyber crime cases. On the contrary, various jurisdiction conflicts have formed in judicial practice. The main reason is that a series of jurisdiction conflicts have been formed within the jurisdiction rules, such as the excessive expansion of the interpretation of the place of crime, the second conflict of the designated jurisdiction, the internal discord of the merger of cases and the negative consequences of the superior jurisdiction. Due to the characteristics of the information and cyber crime, the conflict of jurisdiction cannot be completely eliminated. The appropriate countermeasures should be to coordinate the specific conflicts, mainly including simplifying the identification type of crime location based on the principle of close association, improving the standardized standards for the application of designated jurisdiction, establishing the compulsory merger rules and separate case handling standards, and conducting jurisdiction tests on some special cybercrimes for internet courts.

D925.2

最高人民法院2020年度司法研究重大课题（ZGFYZDKT202008-03）；中国博士后科学基金项目（2019M653243）；中央高校基本科研业务费青年教师培育项目（19wkpy09）