伴随国家治理与基层社会的双重转型，乡村场域的治理主体利益交织、治理客体异质多元以及治理状态交叠模糊等复杂性与日俱增，严重掣肘数字乡村主动适应与调节外部风险的韧性建构。无论是简约治理的化简逻辑抑或科层治理的复杂逻辑，均难以有效化解乡村基层治理日益突出的复杂矛盾，更无法实现数字乡村韧性能力的有效提升。复合治理遵循“以复合匹配复杂”的治理逻辑，与数字乡村治理情境的复杂性之间具有高度契合性，为培育和强化数字乡村的发展韧性提供了一种新思路，价值、主体、功能、制度以及工具形塑了复合治理的重要构成，各个要素协同复合与联动融合，共同推进数字乡村的韧性建构。

With the dual transformation of national governance and grassroots society, the complexities of the intertwined interests of governance subjects in the rural field, the heterogeneity and pluralism of governance objects, and a superposition of indistinct governance states are steadily on the increase. Which significantly constrains the proactive adaptation of digital rural countrysides and the resilience cultivation in mitigating external risks. Both the reductionist logic of streamlined governance and the intricate logic of hierarchical governance prove insufficient in effectively reconciling the increasingly salient complex intricacies in grassroots rural governance. Moreover, they fall short of effecting a discernible enhancement in the resilience capacity of digital villages. Compound governance, guided by the governance rationale of "matching complexity with composite" aligns notably well with the intricate context of digital rural governance, providing a new approach to cultivate and strengthen the development resilience of digital villages. The constituents of compound governance are principally forged through the configuration of values, agencies, functions, institutional frameworks, and instruments. The synergy and linkage integration of various elements synchronously propel the establishment of resilience in digital rural areas.

C912.82

江苏省教育厅资助项目（2022SJZD134）；江苏高校优秀创新团队建设项目（NH33710921）