基于2023年各地信访典型案例、政府留言数据以及访谈材料的分析发现，基层信访治理不再单纯作为压制性手段，而是实现了由传统向现代、从群众路线到压制作用再到回应性范式的转变，这表现在功能回应性、结构回应性与互动回应性三个维度上。基层信访承担了群众沟通、诉求解决与政策响应的三重回应性功能，功能的变迁带来了信访系统内部结构的分化，组织结构、权力结构、程序结构与责任结构以自主调适的形式，回应系统功能和社会问题。为协调功能回应性与结构回应性，使二者保持时间上的同频与方向上的一致，基层信访治理还调动起情感要素，联动资源要素，推动功能与结构之间的互动回应，开创了基层回应性信访治理的生动格局。

An analysis of cases of petitions, messages on governments’ websites in various provinces and interviews with petition practitioners indicates that, grassroots petition governance is no longer merely a tool of repression. Instead, it has undergone a paradigm transition from the traditional implementation of mass line to a repressive role, and finally to a modern form of governance with responsive qualities, embodied in the three dimensions of functional responsiveness, structural responsiveness and interactive responsiveness. The grassroots petition has performed on the triple responsive function of the masses communication, appeals resolution, and policy response. The functional changes have resulted in the internal structural differentiation of the petition system, in which the organizational structure, power structure, procedural structure and liability structure have responded to functions and social problems by means of autonomous adjustment. In order to coordinate functional responsiveness and structural responsiveness, maintaining the simultaneous frequency and consistent direction, grassroots petition governance has also mobilized the element of emotion, linked multiple resources, and promoted the interactive response between function and structure, thus creating a vivid pattern of responsive grassroots governance.

D632.8